e-ISSN: 2618-0979     print ISSN: 2618-0960
Computerized tomography imaging of the bone dehensances in the orbital medial wall and evaluation of terminological
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText## Journal of Theoretical, Clinical and Experimental Morphology

Abstract

The bone structures forming the orbital medial wall are the lateral or orbital side of the lacrimal bone, the frontal process of the maxillary bone, the lamina papyracea of the ethmoid bone, and the corpus of the sphenoid bone. The paranasal sinuses (PNS) are a region with many variations. Bone structures are very thin and dehiscences are common [ONODI 1909].

In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency, age and sex relationship of patients with bone continuity in pati- ents who underwent standard PNS CT examination, to reveal the efficacy of computed tomography for the detection of bone defects in the orbital medial wall, and to highlight the terminological differences in this literature. Computed tomography (CT) of the paranasal sinuses provides detailed information about sinonasal anatomy and variations.

The shots were made with GE brand IQ model 32 detector spiral device,  using 130 kV voltage and 80-120 mAn  values according to bone protocol. In 115 patients (59 males, 56 females), 230 orbital medial walls revealed 71 (30.9%) bone defects (34 males, 37 females). In 8 of these cases (4 males, 4 females), herniation of orbital fat tissue into the ethmoid sinus was present.

In our study, bone loss without herniation was found to be higher than mentioned in the literature. It was thought that low density bone structure below a certain thickness could not be differentiated in density by CT examinations, and that the findings could be confirmed by microdissection of the samples with dehiscence in the CT specimens.

As a result, we believe that radiologists should investigate the existence of these dehiscences whether or not there is a herniation in the PNS CT evaluation, and that more attention should be paid to the correct use of the words herniation and dehiscence / Gap in interpretations and studies.

References

Bolger W., Butzin C., Parsons D. Paranasal Sinus Bony Anatomic Variations and Mucosal Abnormalities: CT Analysis for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 56-64.

Moon H., Kim H., Lee J., Chung I. et al. Surgical anatomy of the anterior ethmoidal canal in ethmoid roof. Laryngoscope . 2001; 111: 900- 904.

Meyers R., Valvassori G. Interpretation of Anatomic Variations of Computed Tomography Scans of the Sinuses: A Surgeon’s Perspective. Laryngoscope. (1998; 108: 422-425.

Moulin G, Dessi P, Chagnaud C, Bartoli J., et al. Dehiscence of the Lamina Papyracea of the Ethmoid Bone: CT Findings. AJNR . 1994; 15: 151-153.

Lang J, Schafer K. Ethmoidal arteries: origin, course, regions supplied and anastomoses. Acta Anat (Basel) 1979;104: 183-197.

Basak S, Karaman C., Akdilli A. et al. Evaluation of some important anatomical variations and dangerous areas of the paranasal sinuses by CT for safer endonasal surgery. Rhinology. 1998; 36: 162–167.

Bhatti M., Stankiewicz J. Ophthalmic complica- tions of endoscopic sinus surgery. Surv Ophthal- mol. 2003; 48: 389–402.

Cankal F, Apaydin N, Acar H. et al. Evaluation of the anterior and posterior ethmoidal canal by computed tomography. Clin Radiol. 2004;5 9(11): 1034–1040.

Hyrtl J. Vergangenheit und Gegewart des Museum for Menschliche Anatomie. An der Wiener Universitat. Baumüller, Ed Wien. 1869

Teatini G., Simonetti G., Salvolini U. et al. Computed Tomography of the Ethmoid Labyrinth and Adjacent Structures. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1987: 96: 239-250

Meloni F, Mini R, Rovasio S. et al. Anatomic variations of surgical importance in ethmoid labyrinth and sphenoid sinus. A study of radiological anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat. 1992; 14: 65-70.

Makarioua E, Patsalidesa A, Harleyb E. Dehi- scence of the lamina papyracea: MRI findings. Clinical Radiology Extra. 2004; 59(5): 40- 42. 13.Kitaguchi Y, Takahashi Y, Mupas-Uy J, et al. Characteristics of Dehiscence of Lamina Papyracea Found on Computed Tomography Before Orbital and Endoscopic Endonasal Surgeries. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2016; 27(7): e662-e665

Seeley M., Waterhouse D., Shetty S. et al. Boundary issues: a case of nontraumatic bilateral dehiscence of the lamina papyracea. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2010; 136: 88-89

Chao T. Protrusion of orbital content through dehiscence of lamina papyracea mimics ethmoiditis: a case report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128: 433–435.

Lim J., Hadfield P., Ghiacy S. et al. Medial Orbital Protrusion – a Potentially Hazardous Anomaly During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 1999; 113: 754-755

Gotwald T., Menzler A, Beauchamp N. Para- nasal and Orbital Anatomy Revisited: Identi- fication of the Ethmoid Arteries on Coronal CT Scans. Critical Rewiews in Computed Tomo- graphy. 2003; 44 (5): 263-278.

Harrison D. Surgical approach to the medial orbital wall. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981; 90: 415–419.

Ohnishi T, Yanagisawa E. Endoscopic anato- my of the anterior ethmoidal artery. Ear Nose Throat J. 1994; 73: 634–636.

Minnigerode B. Zur Anatomie und Klinischen Bedeutung des Canalis Ethmoidalis. Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie und ihre Grenzgebiete. 1996; 45: 554-559

Kainz J, Stammberger H. Das dach des vorderen Siebbeines: Ein locus minoris resistentiae an der Schadelbasis. Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie . 1988; 67: 142-149

PDF (Azərbaycanca)
PDF (Azərbaycanca)

Keywords

Orbital medial wall
bone dehissans
computed tomography
loss of bone continuity Орбитальная медиальная стенка
костный дехиссан
computed tomography
компьютерная томография
потеря непрерывности кости Orbita medial duvarı
kemil dehissanskları
bilgisayarlı tomografi
kemik devamlılık kaybı