e-ISSN: 2618-0979     print ISSN: 2618-0960
COMPARİSİION OF COMPLETİON OF RESULTS ON SOMATOTYPLY SECTİONS OF 16-20 YEAR OLD GİRLS İN ACCORDANCE WİTH THE SCHEMES OF M.V.CHERNORUTSKY AND I.V.QALANT-B.A. NİKİTYUK-V.P.CHTESOV
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText## Journal of Theoretical, Clinical and Experimental Morphology

Abstract

The purpose of the work is to compare the relationship between somatotypes classified according to the scheme I.B. Galant-B.A.Nikityuk-V.P.Chtesov and somatotypes classified according to the scheme M.V.Chernorutsky. For this purpose 755girls aged 16-20 were studied by classical anthropometry. We conducted and analysis of the somatotype classification of 16-20 year old girls examined according to the M.V.Chernorutsky scheme adopted in practical medicine. According to this scheme, aestenic, normosthenic and hypersthenic body types are distinguished. According to our evidence, normosthenic somatotype was predominant among girls aged 16-20 years (43,3%), in 35.6 % of cases –hypertensive, in 21.1%-aestenic type. We also analyzed the correspondence of the divisions in the constitutional groups according to the schemes of M.V. Chernorutsky and I.V. Galant-B.A. Nikityuk-V.P.Chtesov. According to the evidence obtained, the mesoplastic somatotype (54.5%) predominated among women of normosthenic (M.V.Chernorutsky scheme) body type according to the I.V.Galant-B.A.Nikityuk-V.P.Chtesov scheme, and relatively rare cases-indeterminate (20.2%) constitutional group, subatletic (14.4%) and athletic (10.9%) somatotypes were found. Among girls aged 16-20 with a hypertensive body structure, picnic (40.2%) and Europlastic short (38.3%) somatotypes predominated, while girls with europlastic height (15.6%) somatotype and indeterminate (5.9%) were representatives of the constitutional group. Among girls with aestenic body type, stenoplastic somatotype prevailed
(71.7%), and somatotypes with aestenic naroow bone (21.1%) and aestenic wide bone (7.2%) prevailed.

References

1. Qanbayeva, Ş.F. Müxtəlif yaş qruplarına aid qadın çanağının pelviometrik göstəriciləri // Ş.F.Qanbayeva. – Bakı: Azərbaycan Tibb Jurnalı,
– 2019, №1, – s. 172-176.
2. Şadlinski, V.B., Abdullayev A.S. Antropologiya 39 типах, аномалии конституции и диатезах // Москва: Вопросы детской диетологии, – 2013. т. 11, вып. 4, – с. 44-50.
3. Никитюк Д.Б. Антропонутрициология как новое научное направление // – Воронеж: Журнал анатомии и гистопатологии, – 2018, №4, – с. 9-19.
4. Yoo J. Relatiobinships between body mass index, fat mass, muscle mass, and musculoskeletal pain in community residents // J.Yoo, N.Cho, S.Lim [et all.] Artritis and Rheumatology. – 2014.
66(12) – p. 3511-3520.
5. Черноруцкий М.В. Учение о конституции в клинике внутренних болезней // М.В.Черноруцкий. – Ленинград: Труды VII съезда российских терапевтов, – 1925. – с. 345-364. 9.
Никитюк Б.А. Морфология человека / Б.А.Никитюк, В.П.Чтецов. – Москва: Издательство Московского государственного университета, – 1990. – 320 с.
6. Парфенова И.А. Возрастные изменения минеральной плотности костей скелета, массы мышечной, соединительной и жировой тканей у людей с разными типами конституции
развития / Автореферат дис…канд.мед.наук/ – 2007, – 22 с.
7. Автандилов Г.Г. Медицинская морфометрия // Г.Г.Автандилов. – Москва: Медицина, – 1990. – 384 с
PDF (Azərbaycanca)
PDF (Azərbaycanca)

Keywords

Diagnostic chemes
constitutional groups
somatotypes
girls
anthropometric parameters Диагностические препараты, конституциональные группы, соматотипы, девушки, антропометрические параметры Diaqnostik sxemlər
konstitusional qruplar
somatotiplər
qızlar
antropometrik parametrlər